Comparison Between Wolves, Plants was Faulty,
Deserved More Research


Letters to the Editor / Anchorage Daily News / April 18, 2003

 

Concerning a column by Craig Medred, if the author wishes to make a viable comparison between gray wolves and any other species whose population is being controlled by the Park Service, he should first do some research. ("Hickel was right; nature shouldn't run wild," April 13).

Canis lupus is indigenous to Alaska and has never been listed as threatened or endangered here. Gray wolves are, however, either endangered or threatened throughout all other parts of their U.S. range. The Miconia calvescen species of plant that the author uses for comparison, on the other hand, is native to Mexico and parts of Central America, ranging down to Brazil and Argentina -- not Maui, the place where the Park Service is trying to exterminate it. M. calvescen is a nonindigenous species that is upsetting the island's already damaged ecosystem. It needs to be removed.

Canis lupus is an indigenous Alaska species, and care must be taken to keep it from ending up on the same endangered and threatened species lists as its brethren in the Lower 48. By creating a comparison between the two species, the author has made a false allegory, one that is misleading for readers who are unaware of those facts that the author fails to provide.

-- Larissa Kozisek / Anchorage AK


 
[HOME] [Back to Current Events Menu]

Wolf Song of Alaska, P.O. Box 671670, Chugiak, Alaska 99567-1670

© Copyright 2003
Wolf Song of Alaska.

The Wolf Song of Alaska Logo, and Web Site Text is copyrighted, registered,
and protected, and cannot be used without permission.

Web design and artwork donated by She-Wolf Works and Alaskan artist Maria Talasz
shewolfworks@alaska.com

All rights reserved