East Coast Thinking



Opinion / Fairbanks Daily News-Miner / March 17, 2004


Alaska again finds itself the target of East Coast individuals who fail to understand this land, who fall prey--a fine word--to the notion that this state must serve as the salve for the nation's environmental misdeeds. The latest manifestation of this comes from The New York Times, which argued in a Sunday editorial that Alaska's wolf control program is little more than "savagery."

About the only savagery visible is that used by the Times, perhaps the nation's most influential mainstream newspaper, in making the case that Alaskans fail to grasp the importance of wildlife.

Here is one example from the editorial:

"In these districts, the new regulations call for an 80 percent 'temporary' reduction in the wolf population. But a reduction on that scale is merely likely to be the first step toward the total elimination of wolves."

"Merely likely to be the first step toward the total elimination of wolves"? Says who? No one is suggesting such an action.

The Times goes on:

"This isn't sport hunting--there's nothing sporting about deploying an air force to hunt animals."

On this the Times is inadvertently correct. No, this is not sport hunting. It isn't meant to be; rather, it's game management. And use of aircraft has been deemed appropriate to manage the prey populations. Certainly, use of aircraft on sport hunts raises significant additional issues.

Why take issue with a characterization in a newspaper so far away? Because this is no ordinary newspaper. The New York Times' opinion carries weight--albeit with those who are uninformed. And the newspaper's editorials and columns are distributed to, and used by, hundreds of other newspapers--including this one--nationwide.

Read it for yourself, though.

Here, untouched, is The New York Times editorial of Sunday, March 14:

'Wolf 'control' in Alaska

In Alaska, the wolf wars have taken a sobering turn for the worse. For 30 years hunting lobbyists have campaigned for what is euphemistically called wolf "control." Thanks to the compliance of Gov. Frank Murkowski and the state's official game board, the legal protections for Alaska's 7,000 to 9,000 wolves have been seriously eroded. In nearly 20,000 square miles of the state it is now legal for private citizens to shoot wolves from airplanes and helicopters. In one district the limit has been increased from 10 wolves a year to 10 wolves a day.

In these districts, the new regulations call for an 80 percent "temporary" reduction in the wolf population. But a reduction on that scale is merely likely to be the first step toward the total elimination of wolves. This isn't sport hunting--there's nothing sporting about deploying an air force to hunt animals. The real spirit of hunting has always been about working within the balance of nature. But not in Alaska.

There is already a hunting and trapping season for Alaskan wolves, and some 7,500 wolves have been legally killed in the past five years. But hunters want more moose meat on the table, and the state has promised them unnaturally high numbers. Instead of setting sustainable limits for the moose hunt, the game board has decided simply to kill the animals that prey on moose--wolves and bears. According to the game board, "moose are important for providing high levels of harvest for human consumptive use." In other words, moose are important, wolves are not.

Wildlife biologists disagree, and so do most Alaskans, who have voted against aerial shooting twice, in 1996 and 2000. But now the extremists have taken over. Any notion that wolves and moose are part of a functioning ecosystem has been abandoned. The hunting lobby demands that moose be managed as livestock destined for harvesting by hunters--the more the merrier, with anything that gets in the way destined for destruction. In Alaska, wolves are now merely competitors seizing valuable human resources.


Elsewhere in this country, biologists have devoted themselves to protecting and restoring wolf populations. Most Americans have welcomed the wolves' return not only as symbols of wildness but as critical players in the pattern of nature, helping balance the population of deer and elk. Anyone who has visited Yellowstone since wolves were reintroduced has a vivid sense of their role in the ecosystem and in the human imagination. But in Alaska, the age-old war on wolves has resumed with all its age-old savagery--the savagery of humans, that is.



[HOME] [Back to Current Events 0304]


Wolf Song of Alaska, P.O. Box 671670, Chugiak, Alaska 99567-1670

© Copyright 2004
Wolf Song of Alaska.

The Wolf Song of Alaska
Logo, and Web Site Text is copyrighted, registered,
and protected, and cannot be used without permission.

Web design and artwork donated by She-Wolf Works and Alaskan artist Maria Talasz
shewolfworks@alaska.com

All rights reserved